

I've done a bit of research on the whole dropped-kerb business, and how we might avoid ending up with rampy, undulating pavement. The standard practice is to create at most a 1:12 ramp from kerb to drive. Yet, other officially adopted solutions exist right here in Oxford.
Here's a good one already in place in Headington on St Andrews Street, just north of London Road..
This treatment levels the pavement, retains the stone kerb and the cobbles, offers good drainage, and still allows cars to drive into their off-street parking spaces.
St Andrews Street has a slightly higher street-to-pavement level change than we have on BCR, so the cobble ramp is higher along the wall frontage. Where a car needs access to a drive, the pavement drops ever so slightly, but this dropped kerb is actually approximately as high as our un-dropped kerbs are relative to the street level. Kinda hard to see from the photos, but that's my estimate from being on-site.
I'm currently drawing up a sketch of how I think we could adapt this sort of treatment to BCR. The idea could translate to BCR by using the existing gutter space as a ramp rather than cut it out of the narrow pavement area, and shift the drainage burden to the channel along the join between the cobbles and the street tarmac.
It makes for a slightly bumpier ride up to the front drives, but hardly worth worrying about in my opinion, especially if it makes the pavements suitable for non-motorised use.
There are six drains along BCR, but only two drains along the frontage of houses with drives at numbers 1 and 37. I'm no civil engineer, but I reckon these two drain regions would need to come in for some sort of special attention to the profile of the cobble ramp. The other four drains are adjacent to full-height kerbs where no front-drive access exists so they could be left alone.
What do you think?